I agree, the historical boundary should be removed, but we need to be sure to show what's in what state. It's quite a little mess.
- Serge On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > puzzled about > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37573502#map=18/40.69986/-74.03910 > > is this really part of today's political boundary, then "(historical)" > should perhaps be removed from the name. And is there any significance > to the funny shape (an owl sitting on a branch?) or should it rather be > aligned with the coastline? > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
