Yes, U.S. Census Bureau treats them as statistical, not aim boundaries. --SEJ
Sent from my electronic tether. On 2015年5月19日, at 21:33, stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: >> On 5/19/15 Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote: >> they probably shouldn't be in an administrative boundary category anyway, >> as they don't have any sort of local governance function. > > Agreed, +1. I've been similarly locally blurring out (away from importance > or relevance in OSM) and/or diminishing CDP boundaries as I do listen here. > > Many of these are in OSM yet they might be seen as they are, especially > as/when combined with administrative boundary. In short, census delineations > are not administrative, rather, more like a statistical approximation. What > that particular census formula purports to denote might be debated, though > that seems tedious. > > At a certain point we start to do cartwheels around Monte Carlo simulations > regarding Constitutional questions getting asked. Let's check that and > continue. > > SteveA > California > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
