On 6/14/15 2:27 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > With both outdated imagery and the Ohio River [1], I've had better > luck placing redundant `note` tags on every way that such a mapper > would be inclined to delete. iD shows `note` in a big box in the > sidebar. It's a bit harder to miss than a (heretofore) ad-hoc tag that > would be relegated to the All Tags section. Potlatch 2 doesn't support > anything like it, unfortunately. well, it's nice that iD supports a note tag this way. as far as i know Potlatch does not and i tested JOSM and it doesn't seem to. so note in iD would appear to be as ad-hoc as my use of README because it sorts to the top of the tag lists in Potlatch and JOSM.
so can we have one tag which is properly supported across the major editors? is that too much to ask? secondarily, if it is indeed the case that this is mostly happening because of paid mappers (i don't know that for a fact), can we please contact who ever is supervising the paid mappers and discuss whether their training program and standards could be improved? richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
