Elliott Plack wrote: > I am now leaning towards the shoulder tag, and perhaps > recommending that the routing tools consider that.
I'd be genuinely delighted to add shoulder support to cycle.travel when there's more than a trace number of shoulder tags present in the OSM database - missing shoulder information is the second biggest bike routing issue in the US IMO (after bogus TIGER highway=residential, of course). But as Paul says, please don't misuse cycleway tags for this. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Extra-wide-shoulders-travel-lanes-in-NJ-tp5856823p5856885.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
