Madeline Steele wrote: > What do you all think about this? The sine qua non for me is that the absence of a tiger:reviewed= tag (or one set to =yes) means that you can trust the value of the highway= tag.
This is especially true of rural areas where unreviewed highway=residential covers a multitude of sins. There is a special corner of hell/Steve's basement for people who remove tiger:reviewed=no on rural unpaved roads without changing the highway tag or adding a surface tag. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Best-practices-for-dealing-with-old-TIGER-tags-tp5874640p5874647.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
