Sorry about bothering people one more time. It occurs to me that folks might be interested in how bad the topological problems with the original import were. In the next day or so, before the low-zoom-level tiles are re-rendered, you might want to check out:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6360587 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6360529 to see just how much was lost originally. Most of the loss appears to have been caused by ring self-intersections in the source data. The source data set still contains some self-intersections, as is typical of noisy GPS data, but the usual techniques for denoising it have worked well (Well enough for our purposes, anyway, in a region where a lot of the cadastre is 'indefinite'.) _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
