Thanks, Paul, that's a big task. OSM (and I) appreciate it. SteveA California
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 4:00 AM, talk-us-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > Send Talk-us mailing list submissions to > talk-us@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > talk-us-requ...@openstreetmap.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > talk-us-ow...@openstreetmap.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Talk-us digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. USBR 66 in Oklahoma (Paul Johnson) > > From: Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> > Subject: [Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma > Date: December 5, 2016 at 3:20:34 AM PST > To: OpenStreetMap talk-us list <talk-us@openstreetmap.org> > > > Just a heads up, I'm noticing the relation for USBR 66 in Oklahoma is darn > near unmaintainable due to the sheer size of it, and I'm taking action now to > prevent the problem from getting far worse in the future. > > The fact that the west end of the relation ends on a dual carriageway leading > into Texas makes this relation extremely difficult to validate as a single > relation. This relation is presently over 1400 ways and is growing thanks to > lane tagging efforts in the region. As this relation has a huge number of > dual and single carriageway segments, it's going to be easiest to split this > into two relations by direction so at least editors can properly validate > this relation. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
