It probably does. I think the scanned topographic maps are on the same new, slower server.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Russ Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote: > Paul Johnson writes: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I will try to contact a couple of the folks I know at USGS (maybe > they're > > > still on this list and could respond?), but it might be the case that > we > > > need to request the imagery and build the desired layer ourselves... > > > > Sounds like a plan, if only to save this valuable service for posterity. > > I'm sure those familiar with me at this point can go ahead and fill in > > their own frustrated and politically fueled rant about my feelings on > this > > even being something we need to be talking about now... > > Does this service degradation apply to the USGS Topographic maps, too? > I've noticed that they load slowly and sometimes not at all. > > I can put up some money, if that's what it takes. > > -- > --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com > Crynwr supports open source software > 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 > Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
