Andrew, could you perhaps weigh in on https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/281 ? It seems to be rather silly to not be showing the best imagery as default in the editors (as I suspect we are doing for Texas).
Thanks Simon On 25.05.2017 18:10, Andrew Matheny wrote: > Jinal- > > I would recommend using the Texas Orthophoto imagery for this area. > > Back when I was importing the Building footprints for Dallas, I > noticed the Bing imagery in the Dallas-Fort Worth area is at least 5 > years old. > > The Texas Orthophoto imagery is flown every year and I believe what > shows now is from January 2017. > > Also, for what its worth, I believe the City of Fort Worth has > building footprints that could be imported, but we just need to get > the explicit permission. > > Thanks! > > Andrew Matheny > > On Thursday, May 25, 2017, Jinal Foflia <fofliaji...@gmail.com > <mailto:fofliaji...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This is Jinal Foflia and I work with the Mapbox's Data team [0]. Our > > team is planning to work on improving the building footprints in > Fort Worth and Dallas [1] on OpenStreetMap. You can track the progress > in our /mapping ticket [2]. Let us know if you have any feedback, > please post in this thread or in the ticket. > > > > [0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapbox#Mapbox_Data_Team > > [1] http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/95 > > [2] https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/297 > > > > Cheers, > > Jinal Foflia > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us