Happy to help. All we'd need for MapRoulette is a list of locations and a proper description of the work we'd expect people to do. Anyone can create the challenge but I'd be happy to do it.
Martijn On Sun, Aug 27, 2017, 11:40 Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Steve: > > thank you for your work. I'll save your list. It appears that others > might be eager to do the same, maybe we can find a good workflow for > that. I wasn't expecting the community to start working on this > pre-redaction but if people prefer that to fixing issues later, it is of > course an option. I certainly prefer out-of-band "marking" of verified > objects to adding a new tag to each! > > Tod: > > On 08/27/2017 07:31 PM, Tod Fitch wrote: > > When you reviewed Orange County, how did you do it so quickly? The only > way I know to go through this is looking at each one, one at a time. > > I could of course make a page with links to the ways, even per county if > that helps, or we could upload the list to some suitable tool. Ian > mentioned MapRoulette but I'm not sure if that would make things easier. > I'm certainly happy to try. Maybe Martijn would like to chip in about > MapRoulette? > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
