On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Horea Meleg <horea.me...@telenav.com> wrote:
> Hi Greg, > > We are editing in Maricopa and Pinal counties area, where we have tiger > and approved local data. Thanks for all input and advice. We already talked > with Hans about highway tags when we had some concerns. We talked with some > mappers in Phoenix about signpost and the tag destination:street, which we > used before in other areas but in Phoenix it’s not used. Could you give us > some pointers: why do you not use it? Could we? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60547575 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/756209453 Look at the history on these to objects. Was name, ref, exit_to, or destination the tag to use or now is it destination:street? Do you put the tags on the node or the way? In my case, freeway exit numbers and mileposts are important. I put in many of the exit numbers. I found something better to do that keep up with all the "shall we do it this way discussions". Go right ahead and make the changes. Your changes will be a model for other future exits or exits left unchanged. Thanks, Greg
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
