FYI, I reviewed the ways with redacted names in California (all in San Diego 
County) and where possible set the names per Tiger 2017 data. In most cases the 
names set by chdr matched the Tiger names but there were some exceptions.

There are a roads that did not have names showing in the Tiger 2017 overlay 
image layer in JOSM. Unfortunately there was no Mapillary imagery for guidance 
on those so they were left unnamed.

Tod

> On Oct 7, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 27.09.2017 21:49, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>> That is helpful. Let us know when you have re-executed the analysis and
>> posted the results.
> 
> http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details
> 
> A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county
> information. I've eliminated all objects that have been reported to be
> ok, and plan to remove or change the names on these remaining ones. (To
> avoid misunderstandings: There's a column in the file that says what I
> plan to do, either "change to XYZ" or "delete", but that does NOT mean
> "delete the object", just "delete the name tag"!)
> 
> I'll start doing that in ~ 20 hours from now.
> 
> I'll then redact the versions that carried the "bad" name.
> 
> The redaction will also affect a few historic objects that *used* to
> have a "bad" name and where the name has meanwhile been changed again,
> or where the object has been deleted; these redactions will be of little
> consequence.
> 
> Bye
> Frederik
> 
> -- 
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to