Shouldn't the tag old_ref_legislative (used primarily in Pennsylvania but applicable elsewhere) be old_ref:legislative according to current key naming conventions? According to taginfo, old_ref_legislative <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/old_ref_legislative#map> is used by far mostly in Pennsylvania to mark the pre-1987 legislative numbers, but a few uses exist in California and England. In all there are over 40,000 uses of this key. old_ref:legislative <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/old_ref:legislative#map> on the other hand is used only in California, but still with over 18,000 uses.
Does anyone think it might be worth it to attempt to change all the old_ref_legislative values to old_ref:legislative in line with current tagging conventions, much like what was already done with the creation of ref:penndot to replace using ref and penndot_ref for PA's state-owned routes? —Albert
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
