On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Rihards <ric...@nakts.net> wrote: > On 2018.01.31. 03:16, Albert Pundt wrote: >> Yeah, that wasn't right of me... I've been using the other sources for a >> bit now and it's really not as bad as I thought it was, plus there's >> more of the old imagery still available than I thought through >> Mapbox/Digitalglobe Standard all over Pennsylvania, just not where I'm >> currently working on. I guess the relatively high quality (albeit very >> outdated by the time it was updated) imagery for the whole country >> spoiled me a little too much. :P >> >> Ignore my previous post, it was dumb. > > your original post did not seem dumb or impolite to me, but that must be > the cultural differences all over again :) >
I was about to write the same. I think you only mentioned some problems with the current imagery, which are observable facts. regards m. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
