On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 12:30 AM Bryan Housel <bhou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2018, at 12:42 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:37 PM Bryan Housel <bhou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can’t a motorway* begin or end* at an at-grade intersection though? >> > > No, I don't think so. It's at least not a freeway traffic pattern on the > side heading towards the intersection. > > > I do understand your point, but a dozen or so people on talk-us and the > six or so people on that changeset 64919426 > Well, 1 person, an AA roads troll and like 5 sockpuppets. There's also a number of people in this thread that do agree with me. > discussion all disagree with you. Is there nothing that would make you > reconsider? > Get the commonly used definition of a freeway changed to include intersections. Good luck! > What you did by classifying it “trunk” back to the Apache Street >> interchange just looks weird. >> > > So why should we tag for the renderer? > > > In this case, the renderer is correct, and it’s making your unusual > tagging preference stand out clearly on the map. > Would you at least consider tagging the last 500 feet or so as > motorway_link? > It's not a mutual split, though; it's the mainline. I don't think anybody would argue link is appropriate in this context.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us