Agreed! That felt very productive and useful. I've wondered if it wouldn't be worth getting a list together specifically for CA/MX/US rail mappers, since we have so much more in common between the three than we do different between the countries where rail is concerned. Plus, I do get the sense that a large majority of the talk-US list may not have much interest in the rail project, so it'd give us a place to work through minutiae when it's not a question big enough (with any non-rail effects) to trouble everyone else.
Chuck On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 6:22 PM Natfoot <natf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for attending everyone. Real useful and look forward to working > with you in the future. > > Best Regards, > Nathan P > email: natf...@gmail.com > > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 3:16 PM Steve All <steve...@softworkers.com> wrote: > >> Thank you for everybody's participation today, I enjoyed "meeting" or >> "seeing" you (again), even if it was "hearing" you only! >> >> I mentioned an article which classifies light-rail tram-trains into FOUR >> categories (not three) in an interesting way: >> >> https://pedestrianobservations.com/2019/07/31/what-is-light-rail-anyway >> >> The gist of the logic for doing this comes from this introduced table of >> classifications based upon speed of travel in both the center and outlying >> areas of the line in question: >> >> Slow in center Fast in >> center >> Slow in outlying areas Tramway Subway-surface >> Fast in outlying areas Tram-train Rapid transit >> >> (I hope those tabs work for your email display). >> >> Interesting article, VERY interesting (and lively — 68 Comments!) >> Comments Section. Enjoy. >> >> Steve > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us