The answer by Clay Smalley was public and visible on mailing lists. Personally I was not answering because someone started mailing list thread under badly chosen title and spammed it to [Talk-us] AND [Tagging] AND [Talk-transit] AND [OSM-talk]
Why not also to [Imports] and [Talk-pl] and [Talk-diversity] And [talk-ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn]? Aug 22, 2020, 21:48 by talk-us@openstreetmap.org: > ever time this person answers, no one else will talk because he is addressing > it to me and not the grope. > > i have never id him as he has me, what about the rules ? > > > -------- Forwarded message -------- > From: Clay Smalley <> claysmal...@gmail.com <>> > > To: 80hnhtv4a...@bk.ru, Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics > <> talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org <>> > > Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org, tagg...@openstreetmap.org, OSM Talk US <> > talk-us@openstreetmap.org <>> > > Date: Saturday, August 22, 2020 2:33 PM -05:00 > Subject: Re: [Tagging] [Talk-transit] [OSM-talk] Call for verification (Was: > Re: VANDALISM !) > > Everyone knows who you're talking about at this point, and nobody cares. > Use the remaining day or so of your temporary ban to work on some hobbies > outside of OpenStreetMap. > > And be careful about who you say isn't local. I'm moving to Northern Indiana > next week and I'll certainly get the chance to survey many of the estimated > stop positions I remotely mapped. I hope to see you around as we continue > working on the same things. > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 12:21 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-transit <> > talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org > <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk%2dtran...@openstreetmap.org>> > > wrote: > >>> it was one person in CA adding 400 unverified tags to rail service in >>> chicago. >>> >>> one just 818 m, away from my home. >>> >>> >>>> SATURDAY, August 22, 2020 12:32 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer <>>>> >>>> dieterdre...@gmail.com <http:///compose?To=dieterdre...@gmail.com>>>>> >: >>>> >>>> sent from a phone >>>> >>>> > On 22. Aug 2020, at 10:15, pangoSE <>>>> pang...@riseup.net <>>>>> > >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Here is yet another example of bad data in our database: >>>> >>>> fix it ;-) >>>> >>>> Of course OpenStreetMap contains errors, just like any other source, and >>>> probably more, given that most contributors are laymen and have very few >>>> experience (few total edits, often just 1). >>>> >>>> On the other hand, we may be very fast when something changes, very >>>> flexible in emergencies (think Haiti), and have interesting niche data >>>> that commercial and public data providers don’t care for. >>>> >>>> It all depends on the local community in the end. If you have reached a >>>> critical mass to have locals everywhere, it will work great and bugs will >>>> wash out. Otherwise the data might get stale just like any other data. >>>> Also using the data is essential to find the problems, for example the 212 >>>> story garage is likely fixed now ;-) >>>> >>>> I tend to agree with Steve A. >>>> >>>> Cheers Martin >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> talk mailing list >>>> t...@openstreetmap.org <> >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-transit mailing list >> talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org >> <http://e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk%2dtran...@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > tagg...@openstreetmap.org <> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
