I didn't complete the test either. I was able to understand the buttons but some samples plum refused to download. At 04:06 a.m. 18/04/2007, you wrote: >Hmmm, if you're going after blind folks, survey monkey, with those ajaxy >non-radio button like things wasn't a smart option. Also, for me at least, >the samples were much too slow and the questions weren't meaningful. I keep >my jfw anywhere between 70 and 100 percent (depending on what I'm doing), and >assign emotions to the speakers myself based on context, just like when a >sighted person reads text. >That was sort of like holding up cards with printing (in a too large font) on >them and asking for the emotional context of the printing. I suspect the data >you get is going to be randomized by people's current feelings towards >doctors, post offices, and dinner. It might have helped slightly if you had >used another language for the text, at least in that regard. >Tasha Raella Chemel wrote: >>Hi all, >>Sorry for the off topic post. >> >>As part of my linguistics class at Brown, I am conducting a survey on the >>emotional qualities people perceive when listening to a speech synthesiser. >>My online survey should take you no more than 20 minutes to complete and I >>would really appreciate your help. The links to the survey are below. Please >>choose either the July to December or the January to June link based on your >>birth month. If you have any questions about the survey, please feel free to >>email me at >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Also, please feel free to pass >>this on to any one you think would be intrested (blind or sighted). >> >>Tasha >>Jan-June: >>http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=454843671754 >>July-Dec: >>http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=103063672407 >> > > > >Did you miss a message? Well, don't. >http://www.mail-archive.com/talk2%40andrelouis.com/ >has it for you. Never miss a Talk2 message again.
Did you miss a message? Well, don't. http://www.mail-archive.com/talk2%40andrelouis.com/ has it for you. Never miss a Talk2 message again.
