IMHO, it is not justified.
While we aren't MAGIC, we deal with a NUI of sorts in Meditech C/S. If your scripts are built well, you will have no issues. Thank you, Mitch Lawrence Lead Applications Analyst Technical Support - NPR/Automation CHRISTUS Information Management *: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Send a "thank you <http://intranet.christushealth.org/spiritBuck/Default.asp> " to someone! ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [talkbws] Meditech Workstation 4.x Good Afternoon All: I would like those of you who use MEDITECH MAGIC to comment on scripting with Workstation 4.x. I have personally refrained from scripting with Workstation 4.x because I didn't want to deal with pop-up boxes and other Workstation 4.x nuances. It seems as if these nuances made my scripts less reliable. So, what do other MEDITECH MAGIC scripters think of Workstation 4.x? I'm asking because others in IT have an initiative to remove Workstation 3.x from every end users PC, including the end users that run scripts. Is my poor attitude about scripting with Workstation 4.x justified? Thanks, Jared Parish Whatever it takes! Integration Analyst CareTech Solutions, Inc 901 Wilshire Drive Troy, MI 48084 United States [email protected] www.caretechsolutions.com Ph: 419.429.6476 Fax: 419.423.5540 --- To post a message to this list, send mail to: [email protected] You are currently subscribed as: [email protected] Unsubscribe in the customer center on our website: http://www.bostonworkstation.com/customer_center/virtual_user_group_talk .aspx --- To post a message to this list, send mail to: [email protected] You are currently subscribed as: [email protected] Unsubscribe in the customer center on our website: http://www.bostonworkstation.com/customer_center/virtual_user_group_talk .aspx
<<image002.jpg>>
<<image003.jpg>>
