[I seem to have forgotten to send this.]

| From: Peter King via talk <[email protected]>

| Can't say that I disagree with any of this.  I protested when the UofT decided
| to amalgamate all its services on Microsoft Server (to no avail), and even
| more so when they made it all but impossible not to use Outlook (after using
| mutt happily for years and years) - on the grounds that Outlook somehow had
| "more modern" security, which turned out to be doublespeak for "proprietary
| closed-source protocols" for accessing the mailserver that they now
| controlled.  Rewriting links and pushing their brand is the completely
| predicable result.

Hear hear!

I have (rarely used) courtesy accounts at U of T.  I just tested.
Mail to me at cs.toronto.edu isn't touched by Microsoft.  Postfix and
Exim only.

| Just recently I was told that the University would not allow me to ssh in to
| my office computer "because ssh had to be protected from the internet" (!),

Yuck.  I can still ssh into the one U of T CS system I tried.  I don't 
know the current nodes that general CS users are supposed to use (it's 
been that long).

| and instead I was supposed to use some binary blob to create a VPN into the
| UofT network

Open Standards!  They should use IPSec and not require binary blobs of
unknown safety.

SSH is good as long as passwords are not used.
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to