On 1/27/07, Kenneth Downs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not usually one to complain about wikipedia, but I wouldn't put too
much faith in that particular article, the author's knowledge of RDBMS is
extremely weak.
Examples of fundamental misunderstanding include:
[snip]
Oh, well, enough of this ranting, I'm putting some intro material on the
Andromeda website today, and getting a new domain name, its only fun for so
long to beat up on somebody's work, much more fun to perfect your own....
Ken, you obviously have good RDBMS knowledge, I hope that the next
time you discover such mistakes in wikipedia that you might just hit
the 'edit' link and add your contributions for everyone's benefit.
Then you could post a link to the NYPHP group about how the article on
wikipedia *is* accurate and well-informed -- thanks to you.
--
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
_______________________________________________
New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in New York PHP
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
