> Just seems like a strange way to write it:
>
>
> if (not port 443)
>
>
> is not logically the same as:
>
>
> if (port 80)
You make a good point. The original will not work for ports other
than 80 even though it looks like it might, I think it would be better
to write the script like this:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.example\.com$ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^80$
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ http://www.example.com/$1 [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.example\.com$ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} ^443$
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://www.example.com/$1 [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www\.example\.com$ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^$
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !^443|80$
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ http://www.example.com:%{SERVER_PORT}/$1 [R=301,L]
This way http://foo.example.com:8080/ -> http://www.example.com:8080/.
Regards,
John
_______________________________________________
New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in New York PHP
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php