Patrick May wrote:
Also, I disagree that CMS users can tolerate a poorly responding site. They add value to the site, and if the cache gets in their way, then they give up on improving the quality of site content.
I don't consider an extra millisecond or ( even 5) when editing a web page to be poorly performing, as the human based edit process is already structured around making changes, hitting save, waiting a second, making more changes, etc.
I consider an extra millisecond when generating content for readers(and having it added to thousands of requests, if not tens of thousands) to be poorly performing.
Both are working with user expectations, readers expect things to be instantaneous, editors expect something to take a little bit of time.
_______________________________________________ New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online http://www.nyphpcon.com Show Your Participation in New York PHP http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
