Hans Zaunere wrote:
Absolutely, some type of shorthand is needed, which is exactly why they
exist in the first place. I think the issue with removing <?= was that no
one could decide what to actually replace it with. It'll come, wait for
it...
Well you're at it, how about a version of <?= that has
htmlspecialchars() built in...
It might be an irresponsible namespace grab, but I've got a
function that is (almost)
function Q($s) { echo htmlspecialchars($s) };
and I get into the habit of writing <?php Q($string) ?> in my
templates so I'm not writing hundreds of HTML injection bugs all day..
_______________________________________________
New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
