It's not enough to complain, you have to find a way to show them that 
this would hurt their place in the market.

On 10/14/2016 8:30 PM, Kenneth Son via Talk wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> Start a petition and send it to this company stating you do not want to
> see Window Eyes phased out.
>
> Kenneth Son.
>
>
>
> On 10/14/2016 18:51, Chris Skarstad via Talk wrote:
>> No official word yet.  If you want to make sure Window-eyes stays
>> around, please write to the VFO folks and let them know that you
>> expect the same type of customer service and great products as you did
>> when ai squared was around. This will let them know you care about the
>> product and that you are a loyal user.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2016 4:17 PM, darren harris via Talk wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Is this actual policy or are people just panicking? Is wineyes going
>>> to be
>>> fazed out?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Talk
>>> [mailto:talk-bounces+darren_g_harris=btinternet....@lists.window-eyes.com]
>>>
>>> On Behalf Of Samuel Wilkins via Talk
>>> Sent: 14 October 2016 20:28
>>> To: bj colt via Talk
>>> Subject: The Phasing Out of Window-Eyes
>>>
>>> Hello John,
>>>
>>> I have been drafting a letter to VFO because, as you know, there is
>>> speculation that Window-Eyes is going to be phased out.  If it is, I am
>>> not switching to Jaws, because I won't be able to afford it, amongst
>>> other reasons.  However, in my letter, I have pointed out that if
>>> Window-Eyes goes, it provides a significant problem for blind people
>>> wanting to get into work, as not everyone has an access to work fund.
>>> Moreover, one of the few ways we can work, especially for younger
>>> people, is volunteering, and there, we may be in a crisis, as IT
>>> technicians are paranoid about NVDA, since it is open source, and they
>>> think it could contain a virus or compromise security in another way.
>>> We would be in limbo, as they won't want NVDA, and they won't pay for
>>> Jaws, as Access to Work won't pay for equipment for unpaid work, so you
>>> would have to buy a license for every computer you use out of your own
>>> pocket.  What do you think?  Also, I have heard that they are developing
>>> both Magic and ZoomText.  How come they are doing that, but phasing out
>>> Window-Eyes?  To me, this is a case of double standards.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>
>> For membership options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/hamradio3960%40aol.com.
>>
>> For subscription options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> List archives can be found at
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/nicksarames%40msn.com.
>
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> .
>
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to