> Serving would certainly be an issue if we got 120 desktop machines with 250 > gigs each (which we could probably find in the trash cans of some > organizations).
If you can find 120 rack mountable desktop machines with 250GB each in them and find a place to put them in a rack somewhere, we can certainly put them to use ... would make a nice processing cluster actually if they had reasonably modern processors. > So, it's not *just* disk and bandwidth. But if CPU isn't an issue, 8 > servers @ 4 terabytes each seems like about the sweet spot in balancing > cost, space, and power consumption. On what are you basing that? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
