120 rack mountable
just trying to visualize ...
4U? ... 200W?
= 24KW ... ooops!
:D
(apologies in advance)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Johnson" <[email protected]>
To: "Anthony" <[email protected]>
Cc: "talk" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [OAM-talk] Moving forward (was: Completing the OAM
PSCelectionprocess)
Serving would certainly be an issue if we got 120 desktop machines with
250
gigs each (which we could probably find in the trash cans of some
organizations).
If you can find 120 rack mountable desktop machines with 250GB each in
them and find a place to put them in a rack somewhere, we can
certainly put them to use ... would make a nice processing cluster
actually if they had reasonably modern processors.
So, it's not *just* disk and bandwidth. But if CPU isn't an issue, 8
servers @ 4 terabytes each seems like about the sweet spot in balancing
cost, space, and power consumption.
On what are you basing that?
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://openaerialmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
