On 23 Jan 2008, at 14:35, Torsten Rahn wrote: >> This looks excellent. I see that there are some minor faults on >> the fonts. >> But for a "quick viewer" that Marble is and for the given >> projection it's a >> pretty good result already. >> That being said we plan to have different quality settings in >> Marble 0.6 in >> general: > > Ah, just comparing it against the screenshot in your presentation: > > http://www.port.ac.uk/special/soc/programme/presentations/ > filetodownload,70851,en.pdf > > I only now realized that you looked at this in "flat map" > projection. Of > course if you look at it in spherical projection the fonts will get > squeezed. > as you basically render "unprojected fonts" against an equirectangular > projection. > > Is there any chance that you could show how this looks in spherical > projection > (maybe with fonts adjusted to equirectangular projection, so there > will be > minimal distortion in spherical projection)?
I will do later on tonight. Or you can use my data to test it yourself. Some zoom levels look ugly due to my database experiments:) simplifying geometry, but should be good enough for testing. > > > Cheers, > Torsten Artem > > -- > Torsten Rahn > > Tel.: 0 21 61 - 46 43 - 192 > > credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 > Hohenzollernstr. 133, 41061 Mönchengladbach > Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
