On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:28:30AM +0200, Lauri Hahne wrote: > I couldn't help noticing that that the Landsat images provided by > OpeanAerial map look muck worse than the Landsat images downloaded > directly from Nasa. You can see an example at > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2293670552/sizes/o/ the > upper image is from OpenAerial map and the lower one from Nasa. > > I wonder if Potlatch also suffers from this.
Depends entirely on where you are. Since colorizing landsat imagery is a choice of algorithms, those algorithms work better in some areas, and worse in others. In my hometown, I prefer the i-Cubed Landsat over the NASA landsat, though clearly that's not appropriate in the area you were looking at. Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
