On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Of course this is very simplistic and I believe you will come up with > much better measures of progress. Let's hear your numbers ;-)
Interesting numbers. I suspect "objects per capita" would be more meaningful than compressed bytes though (but more effort to calculate, of course :) - Steve xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/ Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk