Why not go all the way and say source=cesium? In all seriousness, though, what's wrong with source=GPS as an alternative? Survey, to me, implies a crew out with tripods and such.
Karl On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The tag source=survey hides the fact that those coordinates were derived > from the signal provided by a particular infrastructure: the US satellites. > Maybe those ways derived from GPS tracks should be tagged source=NASA or > source=Pentagon, instead of source=survey, which does not cite the true > source. Just to prevent people from believing that cartography consists in > switching the on/off button of a toy called Garmin... > > Lucas > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk > >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
