On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Beau Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please clarify one thing: > > "any border that is both a state and national border should be tagged at > the highest level (in this case national, admin_level=2)" > > To me this sounds like there is just one way for the state/national > border... but... > > "and the state borders will come in too, with their appropriate style." > > This sounds like there are two ways, one for the state border and one for > the national border. > > This seems to make the most sense to me given the second sentence quoted > above. >
The US state borders are already split into multiple ways, since they all would have been > 250 nodes otherwise. It shouldn't be a problem to further modify them to make parts of them national borders instead. Just make sure to keep the left:state/right:state tags as appropriate. I would agree with Steve that if someone wants to use them as polygons, they should be post-processing anyway. (Or just using the original TIGER data, which is shapefiles.) -Ted _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk