On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 23:24 +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 schrieb Richard Fairhurst: > > Frank Sautter wrote: > > > i agree with you! > > > my idea of how this should be rendered is: > > > grade1: just like highway=service > > > [...] > > > > It's worth noting that tracktype is not a universally welcome tag - a > > lot of people think having an arbitrary scale isn't very "OSM-like", > > and that it's better to tag specific characteristics. We don't > > necessarily have anything better, of course. > > > > I agree. In particular it does not reflect the diameter of the stones on the > track. Having a track with large "rocks" (as it happens often in the Alps) or > very small stones certainly makes a difference when you ride with your > bike....Nevertheless the tracktype information is much more useful than just > knowing it is a track. > I guess we could have a surface=big_stones or something like that :) -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk