On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, David Earl wrote: > We've gone round and round the issue of what road classification means many > times before. With a few dissenters, the consensus has generally been that > you tag what you find on the ground. This sometimes contradicts the > "official" classification. Some people who have had access to this > information have used different tags to apply the "official" classification > (though I do wonder about the copyright status of such information).
You misunderstand the problem - the problem isn't that the classification on OSM doesn't match the official classification. The problem is that until highway=road was approved, there was no classification for "it's a road but I can't remember what type", so people have used highway=unclassified so that the road at least gets rendered. This means that most roads tagged as highway=unclassified are most definately not unclassified roads "on the ground" - they are residential, tertiary, secondary or even primary roads. If a road is tagged as highway=unclassified, it should be a relatively narrow road - it should not be a wide residential road with houses down both sides, or a dual carriageway. - Steve xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/ Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk