On 20 Jul 2008, at 13:40, Hooman Mesgary wrote:
Hi,
so for primary to secondary link should I use primary_link?
yes
should we/you/them change and fix the definition of motorway_link,
trunk_link and primary_link?
You can update the page to reduce confusion.
Regards,
-Hooman
p.s: why u didn't replied on the list?
Accidentally hit reply instead of reply all.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hi,
Use the highest classification.
Trunk -> primary/secondary = trunk_link
Motorway -> trunk/primary/secondary = motorway_link
Shaun
On 20 Jul 2008, at 11:36, Hooman Mesgary wrote:
Hi,
I want to know what should I use for linking a trunk to primary?
"highway=trunk_link" or "highway=primary_link"? what about linking
any secondary to a trunk (yes there is)? because in the definition
for highway=trunk_link said "The link roads (sliproads / ramps)
leading to and from a trunk road" and in the defenition for
highway=primary_link said "The link roads (sliproads / ramps)
leading to and from a primary road"
There is the same question for linking a primary to secondary.
Regards,
-Hooman
ps: also I wrote this on talk page of highway.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Talk:Key:highway#links
--
http://mesgary.com
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
--
http://mesgary.com
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
