If things are clear, and if there is a consensus about using this Karlsruhe schema, let's have a vote on it.
This will make things easier: we would then have a clean situation. This would enable people to enter the data. We may also adapt the tools then, e.g. create a function in JOSM that "explodes" a way by creating parallel ways (for each continuous segment) with pre-filled tags (street names, and so on) so that entering data is easy enough. Charlie Echo ----- Mail Original ----- De: "Robert (Jamie) Munro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À: "Talk Openstreetmap" <talk@openstreetmap.org> Envoyé: Lundi 28 Juillet 2008 17:48:54 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frederik Ramm wrote: | Hi, | |> I really have a problem with this 'way' linking address nodes in the |> Karlsruhe schema. We know that the relation has been created for that. |> This 'way' is just here because some people do not know (or don't want |> to know) how to use relations in the editors. | | Then use a relation instead. It's a free world ;-) No, it's definitely a way, because the houses are spread along the feature. If there was a node for every house, they should be related. Robert (Jamie) Munro -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiN6mUACgkQz+aYVHdncI0EoACghK+VZC1Szdr4AHY0ZcHz1ivX QaAAnjrB7BjRoNpFigfvAacnc2+6WBIU =41Of -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
