No! :-) The layer tag is for things that are vertically separated - like bridges going over rivers and so on.
Cheers, Andy On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:31 AM, maning sambale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should I use the tag layer? > like > natural:forest > > landuse:tourism > layer:X > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:27 PM, maning sambale > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In the Philippines, landcover and landuse are often interchangeable. >> But they are completely different. >> Land cover is the physical material at the surface of the earth, >> while, land use is a description of how people utilize the land [1] >> >> For example, I have an area mostly covered by forest so I tag them >> natural:forest. >> But a mixture of landuse (sometimes conflicting), like, tourism, >> quarrying, national park, etc. >> How do others map this? >> >> cheers, >> maning >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_cover >> -- >> |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| >> | __.-._ |"Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great." -Yoda | >> | '-._"7' |"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden| >> | /'.-c |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ | >> | | /T |http://esambale.wikispaces.com| >> | _)_/LI >> |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| >> > > > > -- > |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| > | __.-._ |"Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great." -Yoda | > | '-._"7' |"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden| > | /'.-c |Linux registered user #402901, http://counter.li.org/ | > | | /T |http://esambale.wikispaces.com| > | _)_/LI > |---------|----------------------------------------------------------| > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
