On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 18:32 +0100, Pieren wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Steve Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Works for me. > > oops, reported too fast ;-) > You're right, It's correct now. As you said, probably a mix between > old and new tiles. Sorry.
This problem with part of a name being obscured does happen with the "Southampton" label here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.902&lon=-1.401&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF It looks like maybe the pedestrian area is rendered on top of the name? Jon _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
