Taging for validation is already a controversial subject. But some of your tags are even more controversial:
> validate:empty-tag-key > validate:empty-tag-value A tag with an empty key or an empty value is not possible/ not allowed. Simple delete or fix the tag if you find such. Don't say to maplint "well it's wrong, but don't care about it". > validate:untagged-way Again, it's nice if your validator shows untagged ways. But then contributors must fix them either by setting the correct tag or the highway=road or deleting them if they are too old. The aim of the validator is to clean-up the database, not to clean-up the map showing errors. > validate:deprecated-tags > validate:motorway-without-ref Same thing : if maplint complains, fix the error by fixing the mistake in the osm db, not by adding a tag for maplint. If a tag is deprecated, replace it by the new tag ! > validate:poi-without-name > validate:residential-without-name > validate:place-of-worship-without-religion Well, this is an extension of the noname issue, now. I'm waiting the next one complaining about the missing "validate:highway-without-maxspeed", "validate:highway-without-oneway", "validate:highway-without-maxheight", "validate:highway-without-lanes", etc.. Pieren _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
