D Tucny wrote: > The lack of history of a previous version would suggest that either > there was no previous version and the way was created with existing > nodes, or that potlatch removed the previous way and replaced > it with a new way which due to some communication issue then > potentially showed as if the nodes were POIs which the user > then deleted after the fact and for whatever reason allowed the > way to be corrupted...
Shouldn't be the latter: amf_controller (the bit of the API that Potlatch talks to) won't let you delete a POI that's become part of a way. But as frequently posted, in a transaction-less database this kind of inconsistency can and will happen. In my experience it's usually splitting or merging ways at times of high server load. > The fix would probably be to undelete the individual nodes that > make up the way... ...and you can do that just by getting Potlatch to write the whole way again. Select the way, do something to it (anything you like, just change a tag or move a node a short way or something), and deselect. When it's rewritten all the nodes will be made visible again. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Data-oddness-tp20893679p20899554.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
