> LeedsTracker <leedstrac...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hello all, >> >> I usually name bridges with name=x but this often interrupts a highway's >> name. >> >> It would make sense to me to have bridge:name=x since we have already >> have bridge=yes > > How about using a relation for the bridge? This would also be > desirable because there are bridges with multiple carriageways on > them. > > Matthias > > What about naming the road with a relation and use the bridge's name in the name tag? Works both ways.
-- Brgds Aun Johnsen (Over Web Mail) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
