Guenther Meyer schrieb: > Am Montag 30 März 2009 schrieb Adrian Moisey: >> Hi >> >>>>> Someone else started a proposal for a gym, I need it in my area. So >>>>> I'm finishing it off: >>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gym >>>> Why not simply use: >>>> >>>> leisure=sports_centre >>>> sport=work_out (or gymnastics or ...) >>>> >>>> Regards, ULFL >>> wh have a key for sports facilites, so why not sport=gym? >> There are no tags for 'sport=work-out' or 'sport=gym'. >> Also, a Gym isn't a sports_centre, its an actual building designed for >> Gymning. >> > right. so you have to create a new one. > as most gyms are not part of a sports centre, tagging leisure=sports_centre > for every gym would be wrong. > > a gym is used for physical workout, so sport is better suited than amenity. > sport=gym (only this, whithout leisure=...) says everything needed to > basically describe and categorize this facilities, so it should be better > than amenity=gym.
No one is talking about amenity here! :-) The current logic is: 1.) leisure=xy for the facility (stadium, pitch, sports_centre, golf_course, ...) 2.) sport=xy for the actual sport done here I don't think we need different leisure tags for tennis_halls, boxing_clubs, ... when we already have a working solution. The advantage of the current system is the renderers not interested in showing different kinds of sports_centres can simply render only this tag generically and ignoring the sport tag altogether - at least all facilities will then show up on the map in question. Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
