--- On Tue, 21/7/09, Tyler <tyler.ritc...@gmail.com> wrote: > landuse. While I'm not convinced national parks, > national forest wilderness areas, > federal/state/county/municipal wildlife reserves > shouldn't be solid fill areas in renderers, I have no > argument that boundary="reserve type" is > inadequate. I do think that there should be a better way to > tag nature reserves and allowed activities, to that end > I'm currently looking into regulations in non-US > countries with similarly regulated large areas (generic > applicable tags seem appropriate).
In some cases they are so large that they're used to help orientate yourself on a map. With out them the map looks less map like. http://osm.org/go/uYrAQb-- Two thirds of the Aust. Cap. Territory is national park, ACT is only 100 sq km I think: http://osm.org/go/uNPvyrl- Although it's hard to tell where the ACT is because state borders don't seem to render at higher levels or when I fixed them up I over looked something. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
