On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:19:25AM +0000, Joe Richards wrote: > > I am tagging some buildings which contain multiple addresses in them, but > not interpolated > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.49994&lon=-2.61296&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF > > > > Since the listing of these numbers is long and sloppy, is it possible to > use the sub-proposal for ranges (e.g. 37-45) given here: > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema#Sub-proposal:_ranges_of_numbers_for_individual_nodes > > I don't know about those building, but in many cases there are different > entrances for each house number in one large building. In that case I would > suggest you map those entrances as single nodes (all on the way making up > the building outline), each with its house number. This solves the above > problem and as bonus gives better routing to the actual entrance. > Frequently not. I've done a lot of addr:housenumber=10-23 Sometimes I've added a node for each entrance. I've even done some funky stuff with writing (even)/(odd) in there, but that's probably not such a good idea. I was just following the principal of recording the information to figure out what works later. Take a browse round putney for some of the obscure combinations I've messed with. http://osm.org/go/euum1sxuh-- Dave
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk