--- On Wed, 22/7/09, Alice Kaerast <kaer...@qvox.org> wrote: > There is also another property which hasn't been considered > - type of > trees. Evergreen vs. Deciduous might be nice to > know. Ordnance survey > maps differentiate between coniferous and non-coniferous > and has > symbols for coppice and orchard. Wasn't there a discussion on species naming a week or so ago? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if... Alice Kaerast
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if... Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if... Liz
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if... Tyler
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if its... Greg Troxel
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if... Andy Allan
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if... Greg Troxel
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? ... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natur... John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natur... John Smith
- Re: [OSM-talk] Do we care if its forest or wood? Natur... John Smith