Christiaan Welvaart wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Karl Guggisberg wrote: > >>> Is this the expected behaviour? Is there a problem perhaps with that >> particular way? >> I think it isn't. I today applied the patch from the provider of the sort >> feature, but sorting of relations is still >> under development. >> We had tickets about *adding* members because of sorting, see >> http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3047 >> >> *Removing* members is not what I'd expect sorting to do, either. Could you >> file a trac ticket on >> http://josm.openstreetmap.org >> ? > > A fix for this issue is in ticket http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3102 > > Note that I wrote this sort function for polygons, e.g. simple boundaries > and routes without loops. A relation that contains a closed way looks more > like a multipolygon.
Sorting didn't seem to help so I've changed it to a multipolygon. Hopefully the relation will now render correctly. Andy -- Andy PGP Key ID: 0xDC1B5864 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
