Gustav Foseid wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de > <mailto:o...@tobias-knerr.de>> wrote: > > Those eight people can only do this if not even 0.1% of the other 10000 > care enough to oppose the proposal. If that's the case, then apparently > the proposal isn't so bad, is it? Why didn't all those people who > apparently hate "path" vote against it? > > > If you look at the voting results, you will see that it was rather > disputed from the start: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Path#Voting
The arguments against come down to two things: "It's complex" (false) "I don't see a need for a generic path" (OK, but others do) Not so disputed after all. -Alex Mauer "hawke"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
