> You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a > bad thing???
Increasing the amount of _implicit_ data surely is. There are good reasons, why putting implicit data into databases is usually avoided. > > Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority, > but it IS a GOOD THING to have llama restrictions in the database. > > The core issue here (that I believe we agree on) is that if tags have > inconsistent implications, they must be made explicit. But in most cases they are locally consistent, thus it makes sense to simply assume different defaults for different countries/jurisdictions. Regards, Marc -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
