On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > The only way I can see doing that is when the "landuse" area is *also* a > "highway" area. >
And then, only if you're sure that's what you want to do. If you have two pedestrian areas separated by a highway, and you use the highway as a shared border between them, you're telling routers that pedestrians are allowed to cross the road at any section (not only at crosswalks). If that's what you want to say, fine. If not, then you need the gap. It seems like something more useful for bicycle ways than pedestrian ways. But I'm sure there's a counterexample to that, just like everything else.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
