On 10/28/09, Erik Johansson <erjo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matt Amos <zerebub...@gmail.com> wrote: >> we had a long thread on this a couple of weeks ago (ODbL "virality" >> questions) from which i think the consensus was that linking OSM data >> with data from independent sources creates a collective database, >> rather than a single derivative database. > > No that was what The PD/Fairhurst Doctrine states. ODBL seems to mean > that we loose almost everything that is share-alike with the current > license if we don't interpret the collective database loop hole a lot > harder than what The PD Doctrine does.
the Fairhurst doctrine was an interpretation of the ODbL - in my opinion it's the best interpretation and doesn't create any loopholes. cheers, matt _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
